A Structural Account of Mathematics by Charles S. Chihara

By Charles S. Chihara

Charles Chihara's new booklet develops a structural view of the character of arithmetic, and makes use of it to provide an explanation for a couple of amazing positive aspects of arithmetic that experience questioned philosophers for hundreds of years. specifically, this angle permits Chihara to teach that, which will know the way mathematical structures are utilized in technology, it's not essential to suppose that its theorems both presuppose mathematical items or are even precise. He additionally advances numerous new methods of undermining the Platonic view of arithmetic. somebody operating within the box will locate a lot to present and stimulate them the following.

Show description

Read or Download A Structural Account of Mathematics PDF

Best logic & language books

A logical journey

Hao Wang (1921-1995) used to be one of many few confidants of the good mathematician and philosopher Kurt Gödel. A Logical trip is a continuation of Wang's Reflections on Gödel and likewise elaborates on discussions contained in From arithmetic to Philosophy. A decade in training, it includes very important and unexpected insights into Gödel's perspectives on a variety of concerns, from Platonism and the character of good judgment, to minds and machines, the life of God, and positivism and phenomenology.

The Law of Non-Contradiction

The legislation of Non-Contradiction -- that no contradiction might be real -- has been a possible unassailable dogma because the paintings of Aristotle, in publication G of the Metaphysics. it truly is an assumption challenged from numerous angles during this choice of unique papers. Twenty-three of the world's prime specialists examine the "law," contemplating arguments for and opposed to it and discussing methodological matters that come up at any time when we query the legitimacy of logical ideas.

Handbook of Philosophical Logic

This moment variation of the guide of Philosophical common sense displays nice alterations within the panorama of philosophical good judgment because the first variation. It provides readers an concept of that panorama and its relation to desktop technology and formal language and synthetic intelligence. It indicates how the elevated call for for philosophical common sense from computing device technology and synthetic intelligence and computational linguistics sped up the advance of the topic at once and ultimately.

Biblical Semantic Logic: A Preliminary Analysis

Biblical Semantic common sense first seemed in 1981, and seeks to teach that the examine of biblical and historical close to jap languages and literatures will be verified on a logical foundation. In a brand new prologue for this variation, Gibson studies the various scholarly therapy of the subject because the visual appeal of the 1st variation.

Additional resources for A Structural Account of Mathematics

Sample text

Do they have wings? Are they in physical space and time? Do they have thoughts? Are they changeable? The theory doesn't say. Clearly, we are in no position to say what intrinsic properties a cherub has in virtue of which a particular cherub is related by typosynthesis to a particular human being. In short, we are in no position to classify the relation as internal. Suppose that typosynthesis could be classified as external. In that case, we can bring into consideration the intrinsic properties of the composite of that human and that cherub.

14 For a discussion of Lewis's objection and van Inwagen's defense, see Chihara, 1998: ch. 3, sect. 9, ls where one can find references to the relevant works. Van Inwagen, 1986: 206. 20 / FIVE PUZZLES grasp the following classification of types of properties and relations used by many metaphysicians. a. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic relations We need, first of all, to distinguish intrinsic from extrinsic relations. This is done by noting that there are two types of intrinsic relations which I shall characterize in what follows.

In the essay, the gloves came off and Frege expressed his true attitude toward the above Hilbertian doctrine. This time, he set forth the following set of axioms: EXPLANATION: We conceive of objects which we call gods. AXIOM 1. Every god is omnipotent. AXIOM 2. There is at least one god. He then wrote: "If this were admissible, then the ontological proof for the existence of God would be brilliantly vindicated" (Frege, 1971a: 32). This objection again illustrates Frege's misunderstanding of Hilbert's views.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.40 of 5 – based on 11 votes